Skip to main content

Gratuity not Required Complete 5 years as a Continuous Service

 



By virtue of the judgment of Supreme Court rendered under the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act in Surendra Kumar Verma vs. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal,[(1980) (4) S.C.C.433)],
It is enough that an employee has a service of 240 days in the preceding 12 months and it is not necessary that he should have completed one whole year’s service.
As the definition of continuous service in Industrial Dispute Act and Payment of Gratuity Act are synonymous, the same principal can be adopted under the act also and hence an employee rendering service of 4 year 10months 11days is considered to have completed 5 years continuous service under sec.4(2) and thereby is eligible for gratuity.
4 years and 6 months (190 days = 1 year) where the company follows 5 day a week
4 years and 8 months ( 240 days = 1 year) where the company follows 6 day a week is eligible for gratuity.
The payment of gratuity ( second amendment) act, 1984 clarifies this. One needs to calculate the no of years and service completion as follows.
A company which follows 5 day week
Doj 1.05.2000 -
01.05.2000 to 30.04.2001 - worked for 190 days = 1 year
If we go by the above formula and if the person does not have any break in service he will be eligible for gratuity on 01.11.2004 
The gratuity will be paid based on date of joining and completion of years of service. It is not based on 4 yrs and 216 days. If the person crosses 5 years of service within that 216 days, then he need to be paid, i.e, based on the date of joining of an employee, the day when he completes 5 years of service, he will be eligible to get the gratuity. But whereas the calculation will be rounded off to the next higher or lower fraction after his 5 yrs completion. So no one will be eligible to get gratuity if he is not completed 5 years of service.

The gratuity will be paid when an employee dies before completion of 5 years service, and will be paid to the dependent family member or nominee. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis of The Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 - by S K Gupta , Advocate , Supreme Court

  Analysis of The Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 ARTICLE ON THE HARYANA STATE EMPLOYMENT OF LOCAL CANDIDATES ACT,2020 AND ITS VALIDITY UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Completely analyzed By S K Gupta , Advocate , Supreme Court www.makeinindialawfirm.com Applicability : The Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 (in short the ‘Act, 2020’) which shall be applicable to all private companies, societies, trusts, and partnership firms (hereinafter referred ‘establishment”) in the State of Haryana which employ more than 10 people in their establishments, will have to reserve 75% of their future jobs employment for those local employees who are being offered a salary of 30,000 or less with effect from January 15, 2022. Exemption Clause: Under Section 5 of the Act, 2020 is having exemption clause by which employers are allowed to claim exemption from reserving jobs if “local candidates of the desired skill, qualification or proficiency

The Madhya Pradesh Code on Wages Rules, 2020

  The Madhya Pradesh Code on Wages Rules 2020 मध्यप्रदेश राजपत्र  (असाधारण) प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित  क्रमांक 494]  भोपाल, गुरुवार, दिनांक 24 दिसम्बर 2020-पौष 3, शक 1942  श्रम विभाग  मंत्रालय, वल्लभ भवन, भोपाल भोपाल, दिनांक 23 दिसम्बर 2020 No.1227-1893-2019-A-XVI.- The following draft of rules, which the State Government proposes to make in exercise of the powers conferred under section 67 of the Code on Wages, 2019 and in supersession of the Minimum wages (The Madhya Pradesh) Rules, 1958 and the Madhya Pradesh payment of wages Rules, 1962 are hereby, being previously published as required by sub-section (1) of said section 67, for the information of all persons likely to be affected thereby and the notice is hereby given that the said draft rules will be taken into consideration after the expiry of a period of forty five days from the date of publication of this notice in the official Gazette.  Objection and suggestions, if any, received at Deputy Secretary to the Government of Madhya Pr

Conveyance Allowance is not wage under ESI Act - Supreme Court

  The below case details and attached judgement copy is for your knowledge and reference purpose. Case between - Texmo Industries Vs ESIC Subject of the Case - “Conveyance Allowance” is an exempt component of wage under ESIC - Supreme Court of India in the case of ESIC Vs Texmo Industries in Special Leave Petition (c), SC-811/2021. Case Details Matter in Front of the Employees State Insurance Court - Coimbatore. ESIC conducted the Inspection Texmo Industries for the period of December 2010 to December 2014. The ESIC Inspecting authorities found Rs. 19,38,300/- was due from the employer which includes Rs. 9,48,517/- for the payment of the Conveyance allowance. The authorities found Rs. 1,45,92,566/- was paid on the head of the conveyance allowance as wages. The ESIC further issued a notice under Section 7-C and subsequently issued an Order under Section 45A for the payment of contribution for the Conveyance allowance paid to the employees of Rs. 9,48,517/-. Texmo Industries paid the rem