Skip to main content

Compulsory Insurance for Gratuity - Not Mandatory

 


Question - Our establishment is covered under the Payment of Gratuity Act. We have been advised by our payroll adviser that we have to get ourselves compulsorily an insurance policy for the payment of gratuity with the Life Insurance Corporation. Is he justified and desirable?

Answer - Neither he is justified nor it is desirable. It is pertinent to state here that the Central government, vide Amendment Act No.22 of 1987, has inserted section 4A under the Payment of Gratuity Act, under the caption of ‘compulsory insurance'. Such insertion of compulsory insurance has not been notified for all these years, but at the same time, it has created a misunderstanding amongst the employers who have obtained compulsory insurance. It leads to the blocking of working capital.

As it is not at all compulsory, the employers or their advisors or executives should not be misled in the continuation of the implementation of section 4A of the Act.


Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Section: 4A Compulsory insurance

(1) With effect from such date as may be notified by the appropriate Government in this behalf, every employer, other than an employer or an establishment belonging to, or under the control of, the Central Government or a State Government, shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), obtain insurance in the manner prescribed, for his liability for payment towards the gratuity under this Act, from the Life Insurance Corporation of India established under the Life Insurance Corporation of India Act, 1956 (31 of 1956) or any other prescribed insurer:

Provided that different dates may be appointed for different establishments or classes of establishments or for different areas.

(2) The appropriate Government may, subject to such conditions as may be prescribed, exempt every employer who had already established an approved gratuity fund in respect of his employees and who desires to continue such arrangement and every employer employing five hundred or more persons who establish an approved gratuity fund in the manner prescribed from the provisions of sub-section (1).

(3) For the purpose of effectively implementing the provisions of this section, every employer shall within such time as may be prescribed get his establishment registered with the controlling authority in the prescribed manner and no employer shall be registered under the provisions of this section unless he has taken insurance referred to in sub-section (1) or has established an approved gratuity fund referred to in sub-section (2).

(4) The appropriate Government may, by notification, make rules to give effect to the provisions of this section and such rules may provide for the composition of the Board of Trustees of the approved gratuity fund and for the recovery by the controlling authority of the amount of the gratuity payable to an employee from the Life Insurance Corporation of India or any other insurer with whom insurance has been taken under sub-section (1), or as the case may be, the Board of Trustees of the approved gratuity fund.

(5) Where an employer fails to make any payment by way of premium to the insurance referred to in sub-section (1) or by way of 'contribution to all approved gratuity fund referred to in sub-section (2), he shall be liable to pay the amount of gratuity due under this Act (including interest, if any, for delayed payments) forthwith to the controlling authority.

(6) Whoever contravenes the provisions of sub-section (5) shall be punishable with a fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees and in the case of a continuing offense with a further fine which may extend to one thousand rupees for each day during which the offense continues.

Explanation: In this section "approved gratuity fund" shall have the same meaning as in clause (5) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961)].

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis of The Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 - by S K Gupta , Advocate , Supreme Court

  Analysis of The Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 ARTICLE ON THE HARYANA STATE EMPLOYMENT OF LOCAL CANDIDATES ACT,2020 AND ITS VALIDITY UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Completely analyzed By S K Gupta , Advocate , Supreme Court www.makeinindialawfirm.com Applicability : The Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 (in short the ‘Act, 2020’) which shall be applicable to all private companies, societies, trusts, and partnership firms (hereinafter referred ‘establishment”) in the State of Haryana which employ more than 10 people in their establishments, will have to reserve 75% of their future jobs employment for those local employees who are being offered a salary of 30,000 or less with effect from January 15, 2022. Exemption Clause: Under Section 5 of the Act, 2020 is having exemption clause by which employers are allowed to claim exemption from reserving jobs if “local candidates of the desired skill, qualification or proficiency

The Madhya Pradesh Code on Wages Rules, 2020

  The Madhya Pradesh Code on Wages Rules 2020 मध्यप्रदेश राजपत्र  (असाधारण) प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित  क्रमांक 494]  भोपाल, गुरुवार, दिनांक 24 दिसम्बर 2020-पौष 3, शक 1942  श्रम विभाग  मंत्रालय, वल्लभ भवन, भोपाल भोपाल, दिनांक 23 दिसम्बर 2020 No.1227-1893-2019-A-XVI.- The following draft of rules, which the State Government proposes to make in exercise of the powers conferred under section 67 of the Code on Wages, 2019 and in supersession of the Minimum wages (The Madhya Pradesh) Rules, 1958 and the Madhya Pradesh payment of wages Rules, 1962 are hereby, being previously published as required by sub-section (1) of said section 67, for the information of all persons likely to be affected thereby and the notice is hereby given that the said draft rules will be taken into consideration after the expiry of a period of forty five days from the date of publication of this notice in the official Gazette.  Objection and suggestions, if any, received at Deputy Secretary to the Government of Madhya Pr

Conveyance Allowance is not wage under ESI Act - Supreme Court

  The below case details and attached judgement copy is for your knowledge and reference purpose. Case between - Texmo Industries Vs ESIC Subject of the Case - “Conveyance Allowance” is an exempt component of wage under ESIC - Supreme Court of India in the case of ESIC Vs Texmo Industries in Special Leave Petition (c), SC-811/2021. Case Details Matter in Front of the Employees State Insurance Court - Coimbatore. ESIC conducted the Inspection Texmo Industries for the period of December 2010 to December 2014. The ESIC Inspecting authorities found Rs. 19,38,300/- was due from the employer which includes Rs. 9,48,517/- for the payment of the Conveyance allowance. The authorities found Rs. 1,45,92,566/- was paid on the head of the conveyance allowance as wages. The ESIC further issued a notice under Section 7-C and subsequently issued an Order under Section 45A for the payment of contribution for the Conveyance allowance paid to the employees of Rs. 9,48,517/-. Texmo Industries paid the rem