Skip to main content

Recovery of Food Expenses from Employees


Central Tax Authority on Recovery of food expenses from Employees, would be treated as "outward supply of service" and GST shall be levied on it. Goods and Service Tax rotates around the event of the occasion "supply", the entire idea of indirect tax collection in the new GST system have transformed from the purpose of 'manufacture' under recent central excise law or giving of 'service' under past help charge law or purpose of 'offer' under recent Sales Tax/VAT law to the point of 'supply' under the new GST law. GST can be levied in-accordance to Section 9 on the ‘supplies’ of ‘goods’ or ‘services’ or both and scope of supply has been provided in Section 7[1] of the CGST Act 2017 Scope of Recovery of Food Expenses for Supply of Canteen Services Recovery of food expenses from the employees for the canteen services provided by company would come under the definition of outward supply as defined in section 2(83) of the Act, 2017, and therefore, taxable as a supply of service under GST. Applicant sought advance ruling on the question whether recovery of food expenses from employees for the canteen service provided by the applicant/company comes under the definition of outward supply and are taxable under Goods & Service Tax Act. The applicant submitted that they have been incurring the canteen running expenses and are recovering the same from its employees without any profit margin and that the service provided to the employee is not being carried out as a business activity.Held: It was clarified that recovery of food expenses from the employees for the canteen services provided by company would come under the definition of "outward supply" as defined in section 2(83) of the Act, 2017, and therefore, taxable as a supply of service under GST. Complete Case AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING – KERALA Tax Tower, Killippalam, Karamana P. 0, Thiruyananthapuram - 695 002 e-mail id: aar.gst@'kerala.goy.jn PROCEEDINGS OF THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING U/s.98 OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017. Members present are: 1. Senthil Nathan S, IRS Joint Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner of Central Tax Et Cents! Excise, Thiruvananthapuram. 2. N. Thulaseedharan Pillai. Joint Commissioner (General), Office of the Commissioner of State Taxes, Thiruvananthapuram. Image result for Recovery of Food Expenses from Employees Recovery of Food Expenses from Employees Sub:- GST Act, 2017 - Advance Ruling U/s 98 - whether recovery of food expenses from employees for the canteen provided by company comes under the definition of outward supplies are taxable under GST Act – Orders issued Read:-Application dated 30.12.2017 from MIs. Caltech Polymers Pvt. Ltd. ORDER No. CT/531118-C3 DATED 26/03/2018 1. M/s. Caltech Polymers Pvt. Ltd., Malappuram (hereinafter called the applicant or the Company) has preferred an application for Advance Ruling on whether recovery of food expenses from employees for the canteen service provided by the applicant I company comes under the definition of outward supplies and are taxable under Goods& Service Tax Act. 2. The applicant is a Private Limited Company engaged in the manufacture and sale of footwear. It is submitted that they are providing canteen services exclusively for their employees. They are incurring the canteen running expenses and are recovering the same from its employees without any profit margin. 3. The applicant has further submitted that the service provided to the employee is not being carried out as a business activity. It is according to the provisions of the Factories Act, 1948. As per section 46 of the said Act, any factory employing more than 250 workers is required to' provide canteen facility to its employees. The applicant detailed the work as follows:- a) The space for the canteen is provided by the Company, inside the factory premises. b) The cook is employed by the Company and is paid monthly salary. c) The vegetables and other items required for preparing the food items are purchased by the Company directly from the suppliers. d) The number of times, the Canteen facility is availed, each day, by the employees is tracked on a daily basis. e) Based on the details above, the expenditure incurred by the Company on the vegetables and other items required for preparation of food is recovered from the employees, as a deduction from their monthly salary, in proportion to the foods consumed by them. f) The company does not make any profit while recovering the cost of the food . items, from the employees. Only the actual cost incurred for the food items is recovered from the employees. 4. The company is of the opinion that this activity does not fall within the scope of 'supply', as the same is not in the course or furtherance of its business. The company is only facilitating the supply of food to the employees, which is a statutory requirement, and is recovering only the actual expenditure incurred in connection with the food supply, without making any profit. 5. The company also referred to the Mega Exemption Notification No. 25/2012 - ST dated 20.06.2012 issued by the Government of India whereby services in relation to supply of food or beverages by a canteen maintained in a factory covered under the Factories Act, 1948was exempted under the Service Tax Law. 6. The applicant, in their application dated 30-12-2017, raised the following questions to be determined by the authority for Advance Ruling. "Whether reimbursement of food expenses from employees for the canteen provided by company comes under the definition of outward supplies as taxable under GST Act.” 7. The authorised representative of the applicant was heard in the matter and the contentions raised were examined. 8. It is true that in the pre-GST period, vide Sl No. 19 and 19A of Notification No. 25/2012 ST dated 20.60.2012 as amended by Notification No. 14/2013-Service Tax dated 22.10.2013 the 'services provided in relation to serving of food or beverages by a canteen maintained in a factory covered under the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948), including a canteen having the facility of air-conditioning or central air-heating at any time during the year' was exempted from service tax. But, there is no similar provision under the GST laws. 9. The term "business" is defined in Section 2(17) of the GST Act, which reads like this:- "business" includes:- (a) any trade, commerce, manufacture, profession, vocation, adventure, wager or any other similar activity, whether or not it is for a pecuniary benefit: (b) any activity or transaction in connection with or incidents! or ancillary to sub-clause (a); ... From the plane reading of the definition of "business", it can be safely concluded that the supply of food by the applicant to its employees would definitely come under clause (b) of Section 2(17) as a transaction incidental or ancillary to the main business. 10. Schedule II to the GSTAct describes the activities to be treated as supply of goods or supply of services. As per clause 6 of the Schedule, the following composite supply is declared as supply of service.· "supply, by way of or as part of any service or in any other manner whatsoever, of goods, being food or any other article for human consumption or any drink (other than alcoholic liquor for human consumption), where such supply or service is-for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration." Even though there is no profit as claimed by the applicant on the supply of food to its employees, there is "supply" as provided in Section 7(1 )(a) of the GST Act, 2017. The applicant would definitely come under the definition of "Supplier" as provided in sub-section (105) of Section 2 of the GST Act, 2017. 11. The term 'consideration' is defined in Section 2(31) of the GST Act, 2017 which is extracted below: " 'consideration' in relation to the supply of goods or services or both includes,- a) any payment made or to be made, whether in money or otherwise, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any, other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the Central Government or a State Government; (b) the monetary value of any act or forbearance, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the Central Government or a State Government: Provided that a deposit given in respect of the supply of goods or services or-both shall not be considered as payment made for such supply unless the supplier applies such deposit as consideration for the said supply. Since the applicant recovers the cost of food from its employees, there is consideration as defined in Section 2(31) of the GST Act, 2017. 12. In the light of the aforesaid circumstances, we rule as under. RULING It is hereby clarified that recovery of food expenses from the employees for the .canteen services provided by company would come under the definition of 'outward supply' as section 2(83) of the Act, 2017, and therefore, taxable as a supply Senthil Nathan S IRS N. Thulaseedharan Pillai Member, CGST Member, SGST To M/s. Caltech Polymers Pvt. Ltd., Kakkanchery,Chelembra.P.O., Malappuram - 673631

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis of The Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 - by S K Gupta , Advocate , Supreme Court

  Analysis of The Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 ARTICLE ON THE HARYANA STATE EMPLOYMENT OF LOCAL CANDIDATES ACT,2020 AND ITS VALIDITY UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Completely analyzed By S K Gupta , Advocate , Supreme Court www.makeinindialawfirm.com Applicability : The Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 (in short the ‘Act, 2020’) which shall be applicable to all private companies, societies, trusts, and partnership firms (hereinafter referred ‘establishment”) in the State of Haryana which employ more than 10 people in their establishments, will have to reserve 75% of their future jobs employment for those local employees who are being offered a salary of 30,000 or less with effect from January 15, 2022. Exemption Clause: Under Section 5 of the Act, 2020 is having exemption clause by which employers are allowed to claim exemption from reserving jobs if “local candidates of the desired skill, qualification or proficiency

The Madhya Pradesh Code on Wages Rules, 2020

  The Madhya Pradesh Code on Wages Rules 2020 मध्यप्रदेश राजपत्र  (असाधारण) प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित  क्रमांक 494]  भोपाल, गुरुवार, दिनांक 24 दिसम्बर 2020-पौष 3, शक 1942  श्रम विभाग  मंत्रालय, वल्लभ भवन, भोपाल भोपाल, दिनांक 23 दिसम्बर 2020 No.1227-1893-2019-A-XVI.- The following draft of rules, which the State Government proposes to make in exercise of the powers conferred under section 67 of the Code on Wages, 2019 and in supersession of the Minimum wages (The Madhya Pradesh) Rules, 1958 and the Madhya Pradesh payment of wages Rules, 1962 are hereby, being previously published as required by sub-section (1) of said section 67, for the information of all persons likely to be affected thereby and the notice is hereby given that the said draft rules will be taken into consideration after the expiry of a period of forty five days from the date of publication of this notice in the official Gazette.  Objection and suggestions, if any, received at Deputy Secretary to the Government of Madhya Pr

Conveyance Allowance is not wage under ESI Act - Supreme Court

  The below case details and attached judgement copy is for your knowledge and reference purpose. Case between - Texmo Industries Vs ESIC Subject of the Case - “Conveyance Allowance” is an exempt component of wage under ESIC - Supreme Court of India in the case of ESIC Vs Texmo Industries in Special Leave Petition (c), SC-811/2021. Case Details Matter in Front of the Employees State Insurance Court - Coimbatore. ESIC conducted the Inspection Texmo Industries for the period of December 2010 to December 2014. The ESIC Inspecting authorities found Rs. 19,38,300/- was due from the employer which includes Rs. 9,48,517/- for the payment of the Conveyance allowance. The authorities found Rs. 1,45,92,566/- was paid on the head of the conveyance allowance as wages. The ESIC further issued a notice under Section 7-C and subsequently issued an Order under Section 45A for the payment of contribution for the Conveyance allowance paid to the employees of Rs. 9,48,517/-. Texmo Industries paid the rem